January 26, 2025
Judge Rejects Boeing’s Plea Deal in 737 MAX Crash Case

Judge Rejects Boeing’s Plea Deal in 737 MAX Crash Case

A US federal judge has dealt a blow to Boeing, rejecting a plea deal brokered between the US manufacturer and the DOJ with regards to two fatal 737 MAX crashes.
A Boeing 737 MAX 8 in flight.
Photo Credit: Boeing

A federal judge in Texas has dealt a significant blow to Boeing by rejecting a plea deal struck between the aerospace giant and the Department of Justice (DOJ). The deal was previously made in connection with the two fatal crashes of the 737 MAX aircraft.

The plea deal, which would have seen Boeing plead guilty to one count of criminal fraud and pay a $243 million fine. This has now been deemed insufficient by Judge Reed O’Connor.

The 737 MAX Disasters


The 737 MAX, once Boeing’s most popular commercial variant, was grounded worldwide in 2019. The grounding followed two catastrophic crashes that claimed the lives of 346 people.

The first crash, Lion Air Flight 610, occurred in October 2018. The second fatal crash, involving Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302, followed in March 2019.

Investigations into both crashes revealed a critical flaw in the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS). This is a flight control software system designed to prevent the plane from stalling.

Investigators found the MCAS system to be susceptible to erroneous sensor input. This anomaly could potentially cause the plane to pitch down repeatedly, leading to loss of control.

A Boeing 737 MAX in flight.
Image Credit: Boeing

In the wake of the disasters, Boeing faced intense scrutiny from regulators, lawmakers, and the families of the victims. Prosecutors accused the manufacturer of misleading regulators and airline customers about the safety of the 737 MAX.

The DOJ investigated Boeing’s conduct, leading to a plea deal intended to resolve the matter without a criminal trial. However, Judge O’Connor rejected the deal, citing concerns about the appointment of an independent monitor to oversee Boeing’s compliance with the agreement.

The judge expressed doubts about the monitor’s independence and the effectiveness of the oversight process.

Reactions to Judge’s Findings


Erin Applebaum, Partner at Kreindler & Kreindler LLP, issued a statement following Judge O-Connor’s ruling. The law firm represents 34 families who lost loved ones on Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302.

“This is an excellent decision by Judge O’Connor and a significant victory for the victims’ families. We anticipate a significant renegotiation of the plea deal that incorporates terms truly commensurate with the gravity of Boeing’s crimes. It’s time for the DOJ to end its lenient treatment of Boeing and demand real accountability,” said Applebaum.

Families of the victims of the 737 MAX crashes have similarly welcomed the judge’s ruling. They criticized the plea deal as a “get-out-of-jail-free card for Boeing.”

Counsel for the families argued that the proposed fine was insufficient and that the US manufacturing giant should be held accountable for its negligence.

A Boeing 737 MAX in flight.
Photo Credit: Boeing

The Road Ahead


The rejection of the plea deal leaves Boeing facing continued uncertainty. The DOJ has not yet indicated whether it will appeal the judge’s ruling. If the ruling stands, the case could proceed to trial, where Boeing could face more severe penalties.

The 737 MAX crashes have had a profound impact on Boeing’s reputation and its business. The US plane manufacturer has worked to restore public confidence in the 737 MAX and to implement safety improvements. However, the legal and regulatory challenges facing Boeing appear to be far from over.

Click the banner to subscribe to our weekly newsleter.

Click the photo to join our WhatsApp channel so then you can stay up to date with everything going on in the aviation industry!

Facebook
Twitter (X)
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit
WhatsApp
Email
Threads

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *