The U.S. Department of Labor has mandated that Asia Pacific Airlines compensate an employee with over $2 million in wages, damages, and legal fees after the airline retaliated against the pilot for raising critical aircraft safety concerns.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) investigators discovered that Aero Micronesia Inc., which operates the Guam-based airline engaged in inappropriate punitive action.
The company dismissed the pilot’s safety warnings and illegally punished them for exercising federally protected whistleblower rights.
Concerns Over Maintenance Practices
The pilot consistently reported that the airline’s maintenance team was improperly approving aircraft maintenance reports without accurately diagnosing engine problems.
A parallel investigation by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) confirmed the pilot’s assessment. It found that the maintenance team used incorrect troubleshooting procedures that prevented proper engine malfunction identification.
Despite the FAA’s findings, the airline’s then-chief pilot and Director of Operations, Ralph Freeman, maintained that disciplining and terminating the employee was justified. OSHA ultimately concluded that the pilot’s safety reporting directly contributed to the airline’s punitive actions.
Compensation Ruling
OSHA Assistant Regional Administrator Ryan Himes in Seattle strongly criticized the airline’s actions, stating, “Asia Pacific Airlines has demonstrated an unacceptable and potentially catastrophic disregard for safety, shamefully treating pilots’ safety concerns as mere employee conflicts.”
The comprehensive compensation package ordered by OSHA includes:
- $419,267 in back pay plus interest
- Eight years of future salary
- $27,596 in loan interest
- Restoration of 401k contributions
- $75,000 in emotional damages
- Reasonable attorney fees
Additionally, Asia Pacific Airlines must expunge the employee’s record and provide mandatory training on employee rights. The airline has the option to appeal the order to the Department of Labor’s Office of Administrative Law Judges.
Asia Pacific Airlines: A Regional Carrier with a Complex History
Asia Pacific Airlines is a regional air carrier operating primarily in the Pacific region, with a significant presence in Guam, Hawaii, and surrounding Pacific territories.
As a wholly owned subsidiary of Tan Holdings Corp., based in Saipan, the airline has played a critical role in transportation infrastructure across Micronesia and the broader Pacific island network.
Operational Scope
The airline specializes in cargo and passenger services, connecting remote Pacific island communities with critical transportation links.
Its fleet primarily serves routes that are essential for economic and logistical connectivity in a region characterized by vast oceanic distances and challenging geographical landscapes.
Ownership and Corporate Structure
Owned by Tan Holdings Corp., a prominent business conglomerate in the Northern Mariana Islands, Asia Pacific Airlines represents a key component of the company’s transportation and logistics portfolio.
Tan Holdings Corp. has diverse business interests spanning multiple sectors, including manufacturing, retail, and transportation services.
Regulatory and Compliance Challenges
The airline has faced significant regulatory scrutiny over the years. The 2019 whistleblower case highlighted by the U.S. Department of Labor exposed systemic issues with maintenance procedures and employee safety protocols.
This incident was not an isolated event, with OSHA noting multiple safety complaints from pilots dating back to 2014.
In 2019, an Administrative Law Judge had already ruled that the airline violated the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act’s whistleblower protection provision. Since 2014, OSHA has received multiple safety complaints from the airline’s pilots.
Historical Labor Controversies
The parent company, Tan Holdings Corp., has a documented history of labor compliance issues. In 1992, a Levi Strauss Marianas garment factory operated by the company was fined over $9 million for wage violations and worker abuses. This indicated a potential pattern of labor management challenges across its subsidiaries.
Summary
The $2 million settlement ordered by the Department of Labor in the whistleblower case represents a significant legal and financial repercussion for the airline.
The ruling not only mandated substantial financial compensation but also required the company to implement employee rights training and record expungement.
Click the banner to subscribe to our weekly newsleter.
Click the photo to join our WhatsApp channel so then you can stay up to date with everything going on in the aviation industry!
